Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the disable-gutenberg domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/jwl23/public_html/rd.johnlander.me/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/jwl23/public_html/rd.johnlander.me/wp-includes/functions.php:6170) in /home4/jwl23/public_html/rd.johnlander.me/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Post-open Review… Choppy seas, behind? https://rd.johnlander.me/post-open-review-choppy-seas-behind/ Futures Market Timing | chaRTroom | Technical Analysis | Instruction Thu, 01 Oct 2015 20:02:19 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4 By: Rod David https://rd.johnlander.me/post-open-review-choppy-seas-behind/#comment-154 Thu, 01 Oct 2015 20:02:19 +0000 http://www.roddavid.com/?p=5309#comment-154 In reply to Steve Marriott.

Today’s midday update was a little later because the post-open review was later. The pre-close view is an hour before the close, and any earlier wouldn’t have information about the last timing window’s origin that defines the post. It sounds like what you’re looking for is in the chaRTroom.

]]>
By: Steve Marriott https://rd.johnlander.me/post-open-review-choppy-seas-behind/#comment-153 Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:10:40 +0000 http://www.roddavid.com/?p=5309#comment-153 In reply to Rod David.

Has there been enough of a downside test of the downside to ‘liberate the bulls’? (sure would be nice to have the Mid-Day Update and Pre-Close View posted earlier)

]]>
By: Rod David https://rd.johnlander.me/post-open-review-choppy-seas-behind/#comment-151 Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:11:40 +0000 http://www.roddavid.com/?p=5309#comment-151 In reply to Steve Marriott.

Yes and yes… That should have read bearish. Also, not that Tuesday’s lows will be retested today, but the sooner they’re tested the more potential for holding that test to form a more durable rally.

]]>
By: Steve Marriott https://rd.johnlander.me/post-open-review-choppy-seas-behind/#comment-150 Thu, 01 Oct 2015 16:28:01 +0000 http://www.roddavid.com/?p=5309#comment-150 “Exiting the bias environment under 1899.75 would have been bullish. Now entering the noon hour under 1997.00 would compensate for the delay.”
Am I correct to assume that you meant to say [short term] ‘bearish’ in the statement above?
The following question may still be premature since the market still hasn’t even tested yesterday’s lows yet, but will this pullback still have a bullish intermediate affect by neutralizing the attraction to the beginning of the rally leg from Tues close (previously, you had said that the sooner the market could accomplish this, the better)?

]]>