disable-gutenberg domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/jwl23/public_html/rd.johnlander.me/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131PFE — The late-August reaction down confirms the preceding action was topping. The question is whether that reaction down fulfilled it. I don’t see the price action since 10/28 as distinguished from the uptrending that preceded it. I wouldn’t get bearish again within this range, not without first probing new highs above 36.50, or else closing back under 30.50.
]]>KMI — Right, still a falling knife, no accumulation. That said, the nearest point for a temporary bounce to begin could be 23.70 to 26.45.
]]>ECIG — I wasn’t monitoring at the time, but I assume that’s a reaction to earnings? That makes the overbought RSI a product of weak-handed knee-jerk reaction. That does not require a retest. If it were ongoing trending that took RSIs (both 1-minute and 3-minute) overbought or oversold, then pretty much all available STRONG handed sponsorship would have been behind that move, making the reaction WEAK handed and due to be retraced.
]]>CARA — Not closing above 17.75 after probing it does undermine the bounce’s strength. That was the minimum objective and its attraction now neutralized. Closing today above yesterday’s high would give the upside more momentum.
]]>AMSG — It doesn’t look like a the stock wants to decline, at least without probing new highs.
]]>