Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the disable-gutenberg domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/jwl23/public_html/rd.johnlander.me/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/jwl23/public_html/rd.johnlander.me/wp-includes/functions.php:6131) in /home4/jwl23/public_html/rd.johnlander.me/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: The Universe, week of Jan 18, 2016… https://rd.johnlander.me/universe-week-jan-18-2016/ Futures Market Timing | chaRTroom | Technical Analysis | Instruction Thu, 14 Jan 2016 04:00:11 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Rod David https://rd.johnlander.me/universe-week-jan-18-2016/#comment-969 Thu, 14 Jan 2016 04:00:11 +0000 http://www.roddavid.com/?p=16716#comment-969 In reply to Josey.

FEYE — I don’t see a triangle. What is the date and timestamp of its high and low?

]]>
By: Josey https://rd.johnlander.me/universe-week-jan-18-2016/#comment-967 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:26:31 +0000 http://www.roddavid.com/?p=16716#comment-967 Triple bottom on FEYE, what’s up time to nibble or short? TY

]]>
By: Rod David https://rd.johnlander.me/universe-week-jan-18-2016/#comment-966 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:58:16 +0000 http://www.roddavid.com/?p=16716#comment-966 In reply to casjf.

CDZI — 5.95-6.35 resistance, then 8.95. Support at 4.75

PRMW — 8.35 support, 9.35 resistance (which should explode higher when probed if the pattern is at all bullish, otherwise probing higher without surging would be suspicious)

]]>
By: casjf https://rd.johnlander.me/universe-week-jan-18-2016/#comment-965 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:43:28 +0000 http://www.roddavid.com/?p=16716#comment-965 CDZI and PRMW: support & reistance

]]>
By: fennecby https://rd.johnlander.me/universe-week-jan-18-2016/#comment-962 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:44:37 +0000 http://www.roddavid.com/?p=16716#comment-962 In reply to Rod David.

got it. thanks.

]]>
By: Rod David https://rd.johnlander.me/universe-week-jan-18-2016/#comment-961 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:23:10 +0000 http://www.roddavid.com/?p=16716#comment-961 In reply to fennecby.

TRTC — Not being the product of basing, this surge doesn’t offer any long-term objectives. But that’s a separate matter from building a long-term position. That strategy almost always includes taking an initial position, and then letting further price behavior earn add-ons.

]]>
By: fennecby https://rd.johnlander.me/universe-week-jan-18-2016/#comment-960 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:52:36 +0000 http://www.roddavid.com/?p=16716#comment-960 In reply to Rod David.

thanks.
If looking to build a long term position then, would you start nibbling only above .11, or wait for the stock to form a stronger base first?

]]>
By: Rod David https://rd.johnlander.me/universe-week-jan-18-2016/#comment-959 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:44:53 +0000 http://www.roddavid.com/?p=16716#comment-959 In reply to fennecby.

TRTC — Closing above .11 would target .13 and possibly .14. Volume’s pattern is compelling, but the price pattern preceding this recent surge was not accumulative.

]]>
By: fennecby https://rd.johnlander.me/universe-week-jan-18-2016/#comment-958 Wed, 13 Jan 2016 07:24:51 +0000 http://www.roddavid.com/?p=16716#comment-958 TRTC: the obvious question – what will make it a buy?

]]>
By: casjf https://rd.johnlander.me/universe-week-jan-18-2016/#comment-953 Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:07:08 +0000 http://www.roddavid.com/?p=16716#comment-953 Thanks, Rod!

]]>