Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the disable-gutenberg domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/jwl23/public_html/rd.johnlander.me/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131
Saturday Review – Page 51 – If, Then… Market Timing

Saturday Review

Saturday Review’s recording (for 10/17/15) …End of a correction?

From its sudden start and its steep slope to its relentless progression, last week’s recovery from its initial dip had all the markings of being expiration-related. It should be obvious Monday afternoon whether that’s correct. If not, then the rally still has room before no longer considering it as only a temporary correction. Those topics and more are covered in this week’s Saturday Review, recorded below.

 MP4 version   ||   ilinc version

The following stock requests were reviewed in this order:
SPX, AMZN, MSFT, V, TWTR, MCD, GOOGL

10/17/2015 09:32:04 David B: good morning
10/17/2015 09:32:19 Mark Glezer: gm
10/17/2015 09:48:57 David B: chinese data on monday GDP,retail sales,and industrial data could have been the catalyst for friday afternoon or sets the trend for monday?
10/17/2015 09:49:18 Mark Glezer: seems like buyer dodged a big bullet perhaps because sellers were too impatient Fri & the move originated in no-bias well ahead of 2:30 & sellers will have a much harder job on Mon?
10/17/2015 09:49:23 SM: Does the bullish scenario you desribe (failing to successfully reject the bullish bias during expiraton) also negate the bearish context from which this has begun?
10/17/2015 10:00:44 steve: if the market does pullback below 1980 do we then need for new context or should the market continue to fall?
10/17/2015 10:03:46 Mark Glezer: indexes – anything interesting?
10/17/2015 10:04:24 steve: small caps underperforming
10/17/2015 10:06:44 David B: AMZN,MSFT
10/17/2015 10:07:22 ljr: stocks: v, twtr,
10/17/2015 10:08:31 SM: larger market question: is there any emerging evidence to sugges that the ‘biggest fish’ is no longer oriented bearishly?
10/17/2015 10:09:16 ljr: sorry meant: visa
10/17/2015 10:11:00 David B: is amzn and msft position of strength for earnings?
10/17/2015 10:12:05 David B: thursday
10/17/2015 10:14:42 SM: you/re mixing up the questions.
10/17/2015 10:16:52 David B: MCD,GOOGL
10/17/2015 10:19:18 David B: earnings thursday for MCD
10/17/2015 10:21:23 David B: googl on thursday
10/17/2015 10:26:28 SM: y thx
10/17/2015 10:26:49 Mark Glezer: thx much
10/17/2015 10:26:53 David B: thanks

Saturday Review’s recording (for 10/3/15) … High notes.

This weekend we examined  the details of Friday’s inverted setup, compared and contrasted it to the prior Friday’s similar turn of events, and extrapolated out its possible implications for Monday. The bigger picture was discussed, too, including a lot of great questions and observations among attendees.

 MP4 version   ||   ilinc version

The following stock requests were reviewed in this order:
GM, SC, AMZN, NFLX, SIG, HOG, GOOGL BGCA, HD, IBKR, CBI, IBB, WYNN, LVS, GILD, FB

10/03/2015 09:31:41 David B: Good morning
10/03/2015 09:50:41 MK: because this has all happened in the same “space” seems to me like this is just a lot of noise in the range no? sponsorship hasn’t changed much… IMO
10/03/2015 09:52:35 David B: is this wasn’t a friday would we be talking about a totally different outcome?
10/03/2015 09:56:16 David B: do you think this reversal was a lot of short covering or the view is now the fed is on hold for 2015 and maybe a good part of 2016 with a possible QE down the road?.
10/03/2015 09:56:35 MK: what i mean
10/03/2015 09:56:35 MK: is
10/03/2015 09:56:39 MK: LOwer highs
10/03/2015 09:56:43 MK: and lower lows
10/03/2015 09:57:32 MK: yes
10/03/2015 09:59:59 MK: ha
10/03/2015 10:00:17 MK: mention yourslelf 30 times in the next paragraph and i’ll really laugh
10/03/2015 10:02:06 Mark Glezer: Late to the party today. Maybe the likely scenario for Mon is to gap up to 1960 & trend down from there in the context of a trend extreme?
10/03/2015 10:02:11 David B: has there been a double bottom put in with a very close test of the aug lows on tuesday?
10/03/2015 10:08:49 David B: with earnings seen upon us and the view they are not going to be good will we start to see bad news is good news and other news events that start to come out after
10/03/2015 10:11:27 Mark Glezer: is it possible that we get much higher like all time high before getting to new lows?
10/03/2015 10:12:40 David B: i think a couple of sat strategy sessions you talked about an ascending triangle and I thought you said if we saw a decline to the aug lows this would be bullish oppose to another leg up and then a drop. Is this ascending triangle off the table
10/03/2015 10:13:48 Mark Glezer: so 2000 at best might be?
10/03/2015 10:14:07 Mark Glezer: 2011.75
10/03/2015 10:16:33 David B: yes
10/03/2015 10:17:39 MK: OK STAWX
10/03/2015 10:17:45 MK: Short Ideas
10/03/2015 10:17:46 MK: GM
10/03/2015 10:17:48 MK: SC
10/03/2015 10:18:14 MK: SIG
10/03/2015 10:18:23 tom: amzn
10/03/2015 10:18:27 MK: HOG
10/03/2015 10:18:27 tom: nflx
10/03/2015 10:21:15 David B: one other question it looks like the pattern we are seeing today look similiar to aug 2011 and then in oct after testing those lows we rallied pretty substanially. Do you see similarities and we could resolve the same way and if we don’t that we have much much further to fall?
10/03/2015 10:22:22 MK: ok
10/03/2015 10:22:33 MK: funamentally both those plays are on Rising rates
10/03/2015 10:22:39 MK: same with hog
10/03/2015 10:22:45 MK: so if that thesis is thrown out
10/03/2015 10:22:49 MK: these acutally look like buys
10/03/2015 10:23:35 MK: IBKR (L)
10/03/2015 10:25:05 tom: ok thx
10/03/2015 10:28:04 tom: nflx hardly moved yesterday but reports eanings on the 14th and implied volatility is huge on Oct 15 options which should support price
10/03/2015 10:28:07 David B: just going back to the aug lows around 1857 and tuesday low of 1861 isn’t the spread between the futures and cash different at those times so how you can make a distinction it was not equivalent test?
10/03/2015 10:28:29 MK: ok moving on
10/03/2015 10:29:25 MK: ok
10/03/2015 10:29:41 MK: HD (S)
10/03/2015 10:30:47 Mark Glezer: Rod, did u mention your schedule for Wed night in NYC?
10/03/2015 10:30:48 MK: no
10/03/2015 10:30:52 MK: IBKR (L)
10/03/2015 10:30:54 MK: HD(S)
10/03/2015 10:31:25 MK: CBI (L)
10/03/2015 10:31:28 tom: googl
10/03/2015 10:34:49 Mark Glezer: BGCA
10/03/2015 10:40:13 MK: looking at that chart
10/03/2015 10:40:15 MK: i’m less bullish
10/03/2015 10:40:33 Mark Glezer: Sushi Hama @ Rockefeller Center – 11 W 51st – b/w 5th & 6th Ave
10/03/2015 10:41:58 MK: HD
10/03/2015 10:41:59 MK: not HDS
10/03/2015 10:42:51 MK: i’m about to capitualte on this short
10/03/2015 10:43:00 MK: capitulate
10/03/2015 10:44:10 MK: ok
10/03/2015 10:45:29 tom: thx
10/03/2015 10:45:30 MK: have a good weekend eveyroen
10/03/2015 10:48:04 Mark Glezer: yes
10/03/2015 10:48:41 Mark Glezer: sushi place I suggested for Wed
10/03/2015 10:50:27 David B: can you go back and look at last question about the aug and tuesday lows test.
10/03/2015 10:51:28 David B: so it has to be 1867?
10/03/2015 10:51:40 David B: to test?
10/03/2015 10:51:58 Mark Glezer: based on Fri action does it look like unless we gap down substantially, reversal down is unlikely to happen immediately?
10/03/2015 10:53:07 Josey: A fresh low was made it looks like back then 2011 on a retest of low
10/03/2015 10:53:30 David B: yes
10/03/2015 10:54:29 David B: does what is going look similiar to 1987?
10/03/2015 10:54:35 David B: going on
10/03/2015 10:54:43 David B: from aug to oct
10/03/2015 10:55:43 David B: is your expectaion to at least see 1695?
10/03/2015 10:58:11 Mark Glezer: 1400?
10/03/2015 10:58:30 David B: was 666a true bottom put in?
10/03/2015 10:59:38 David B: you always talked about BAC and its low
10/03/2015 11:04:13 Josey: TY Rod, All have a great weekend :)
10/03/2015 11:04:25 David B: Thanks
10/03/2015 11:04:51 Mark Glezer: thx much

Saturday Review Link

Be sure to join us at either link below by 9:30am ET for this weekend’s Saturday Review.

We’ll discuss the bigger picture, from this past week’s corrective bounce, Friday’s “session-long” setup, and possible Sunday night and Monday morning price action. And then we’ll review any stock charts that you request.

 XP-Friendly   ||   non-xp ilinc

Saturday Review’s recording (for 9/19/15) … WedEX, Fri, and Mon.

Confused by the WedEX setup? In this week’s Saturday Review, I do my best not to confuse you even more. Good luck with that. We also discuss the “failed Ascending Triangle” types and their consequences, and expiration’s possible resolutions Monday.

 MP4 version   ||   ilinc version

The following stock requests were reviewed in this order:
RY, MFC, SU, XLP, AAPL

09/19/2015 09:35:09 Steve: gm
09/19/2015 09:36:00 Charles Daniel: hi0
09/19/2015 09:36:09 Mark Glezer: gm
09/19/2015 09:36:16 s: Since you given us and understanding that WedEx
influences Friday afternoon and Monday morning, I’m concluding that your
recent comments about yesterday morning’s rally indicate that while the
WedEx influence manifests on Fri afternoon and Mon morning, if an
INVERSION is occurring, this is evident on Friday MORNING. Can you
please confirm this interpretation of your statements?
09/19/2015 09:41:28 s: From your post-market Wrap: “The morning rallied,
so WedEX couldn’t be inverted, only invalidated.”
09/19/2015 09:44:40 s: So then, Friday MORNING is relevant to WedEx.
09/19/2015 09:44:55 s: (albeit not influenced by it)
09/19/2015 09:45:35 Mark Glezer: is it possible that bullish
implications signalled at Wed close already played out with Thu
afternoon surge that made it easier to invaliidate WedEx, in case it is
invalidated?
09/19/2015 09:49:06 Steve: If the Wed-ex plays out and Monday afternoon
is higher, does it signal anything thereafter or is it then done.
09/19/2015 09:51:12 Mark Glezer: Would u still qualify as bullish WedEx
if another gap down rallies Mon morning?
09/19/2015 09:52:30 ljr: stocks: ry, mfc plz. I will watch recording
09/19/2015 09:56:43 s: still active
09/19/2015 09:57:09 ljr: stocks: su and xlp. thx
09/19/2015 09:58:12 s: No, I didn’t say that an invesion IS occurring,
I’m asking if you’re saying that Friday MORNING can inform us of an
inversion
09/19/2015 09:59:27 s: you mis read this: “….IF an INVERSION is
occurring, this is evident on Friday MORNING.”
09/19/2015 10:05:34 Bill G: Would you expect Thursday’s prior higher
lows to be probed prior to a durable decline?
09/19/2015 10:05:47 s: thx, that helps me understand the relevance of
other timing windows to WedEx
09/19/2015 10:05:51 Mark Glezer: retest of Thu high is still possible in
this context and still be vulerable to reversing down sharply?
09/19/2015 10:13:56 Mark Glezer: haha
09/19/2015 10:15:51 Mark Glezer: delining from just retesting 1977 area
high prior lows would not be as bearish as retesting the high?
09/19/2015 10:16:18 Mark Glezer: k
09/19/2015 10:16:29 steve: can a near term rally succeed and go on to
new all time highs or is a near term rally doomed.
09/19/2015 10:16:58 Charles Daniel: good q
09/19/2015 10:27:45 Bill G: Another mkt question. Wouldn’t it be unusual
to have an important durable turning point to be so directly tied to a
news event like the Fed meeting? Another reason for a rally?
09/19/2015 10:29:53 s: Can you review why Thursday’s action did not meet
the requirements of a pivot reversal?
09/19/2015 10:32:21 Bill G: Mathimatically the bar high will not be the
high unless it closes at a new high since rsi is based on closses?
09/19/2015 10:33:02 s: If the breakout of the ascending triangle is
false, how can that be sponsored by ‘strong hands’?
09/19/2015 10:36:15 s: : )
09/19/2015 10:36:29 Mark Glezer: lol
09/19/2015 10:36:44 s: classic
09/19/2015 10:37:38 Mark Glezer: thx much
09/19/2015 10:37:58 Bill G: Have a good one
09/19/2015 10:38:21 Charles Daniel: tks

09/19/2015 10:38:26 s: thx