Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the disable-gutenberg domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/jwl23/public_html/rd.johnlander.me/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131
Mid-day Update… Will lightning strike twice? – If, Then… Market Timing

Mid-day Update… Will lightning strike twice?

Morning rally’s retracement still has a margin of comfort.

This morning’s 2046.50 bias-up target was put back into play by the late bias-up signal. Its test was likely to visit 2048.00, which it did, on the way to 2054.25.

As quickly as the bias signal probed higher, it has taken four times as long to retrace back down to this morning’s 2040.75 bias-up signal. And there’s no assurance of reversing back down through it.

There’s still time — time, and recent volatility — to retest yesterday’s ~2027.00 lows down to 2022.50 and still recover. But closing today under 2040.00 would confirm yesterday’s simultaneous break under both it and 2052.00 (2048 and 2060 basis Dec).  Closing today above 2052.00 would end the recent decline.

3 Comments

  1. SM on December 10, 2015 - 1:24 pm at 1:24 pm

    Haven’t seen any mention of OB RSIs being a relevant attraction for a retest of the highs. Is there some reason why OB RSIs aren’t a factor today?



    • Rod David on December 10, 2015 - 1:34 pm at 1:34 pm

      No. But they’re never a timing tool. Any downside was likely to be only temporary, for many reasons, among them being the overbought RSIs that would be left outstanding.



  2. SM on December 10, 2015 - 1:59 pm at 1:59 pm

    1) Since today’s high is a test of the 61.8 retracement of yesterday’s down leg, would a close above today’s highs indicate that the downside is done (for now)?
    2) Since “any downside [today] was likely to be only temporary…”, does the fact that the downside test was delayed, connote bearishness?